10 Integral Steps in LLM Application Development

In the rapidly evolving AI landscape, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools, driving innovation across various sectors. From enhancing customer service experiences to providing insightful data analysis, the applications of LLMs are vast and varied. However, building a successful LLM application involves much more than just leveraging advanced technology. It requires a deep understanding of the underlying principles, a keen awareness of the potential challenges, and a strategic approach to development and deployment.

In this article, we address critical aspects of the LLM application development process, such as choosing the right foundation model, customizing it for specific needs, establishing a robust ML infrastructure, and ensuring the ethical integrity and safety of the application. Our aim is to equip you with the knowledge and insights needed to navigate the complexities of LLM development and deployment, ensuring that your application not only performs optimally but also aligns with the highest standards of responsibility and user trust.

1. Decide Between a Proprietary or Open-Source Foundation Model.

When embarking on the journey of building an LLM application, one of the first and most crucial decisions is choosing the foundation model. In the first step, you need to choose between two primary options: proprietary models and open-source models. Each comes with its unique advantages and challenges, and understanding these is key to making an informed decision that aligns with your project’s goals, budget, and technical capabilities.

Proprietary Models: Efficiency at a Cost

Proprietary models, such as OpenAI’s GPT models, Anthropic’s Claude models, AI21 Labs’ Jurassic models, and Cohere’s models, are owned by specific organizations. Access to these models typically requires API calls, and usage is generally fee-based. The advantages of proprietary models are notable: they often represent the cutting edge in terms of performance and capabilities, having been developed by teams with significant resources. This makes them an attractive choice for enterprises seeking advanced, ready-to-use solutions.

However, these benefits come with trade-offs. The cost can be a barrier, especially for smaller companies or individual developers. Additionally, the closed nature of these models means less transparency and flexibility. If issues arise, troubleshooting can be challenging due to the lack of access to the underlying code.

Open-Source Models: Flexibility with Limitations

On the other end of the spectrum are open-source models like Meta’s Llama models, Falcon models by the Technology Innovation Institute in Abu Dhabi, Microsoft’s Phi models, and Stability AI’s StableLM models. These are typically free to use, fostering a collaborative environment where developers can modify and build upon the existing code. This openness is a boon for innovation, allowing for customization and a deeper understanding of the model’s inner workings.

However, open-source models often come with their own set of challenges. They may not be as regularly updated or supported as their proprietary counterparts, potentially leading to issues with performance or relevance over time. Also, while the models themselves might be free, deploying them at scale can incur significant computational costs, a factor that must be considered in project planning.

Ultimately, the decision between proprietary and open-source models involves balancing factors like cost, capability, transparency, and support. The choice depends on your project’s specific needs, resources, and long-term objectives.

If this in-depth educational content is useful for you, subscribe to our AI mailing list to be alerted when we release new material.

2. Create Targeted Evaluation Sets for Comparing LLM Performance in Your Specific Use Case.

To effectively compare the performance of different LLMs for your specific use case, it’s essential to build targeted evaluation sets.

Begin by exploring general benchmarks to shortlist potential LLMs for testing. These benchmarks provide a broad understanding of each model’s capabilities and limitations, offering a preliminary filter to narrow down the models most likely to meet your needs.

Next, develop a custom evaluation set tailored to your specific use case. This set should comprise examples that accurately reflect the scenarios in which the LLM will operate. To ensure a comprehensive assessment:

Start Small: Begin with a manageable number of examples, such as 10. This allows for a focused and detailed analysis of each model’s response to these scenarios. Repeating these tests can provide insights into the model’s consistency and reliability.
Choose Challenging Examples: Select examples that truly test the model’s capabilities. These should include complex prompts, scenarios that could reveal biases, and questions demanding deep domain knowledge. The aim is not to trick the model but to prepare it for the unpredictable and varied nature of real-world applications.
Utilize LLMs in Evaluation Set Creation: A novel approach is using LLMs themselves to assist in building your evaluation set. For instance, an LLM can generate question-and-answer pairs from a given text, which then serve as a preliminary batch of test cases. This method can be particularly useful for applications like question-answering systems, where generating diverse and relevant queries is crucial.

By carefully constructing your evaluation set with challenging, representative examples, you can gain valuable insights into each model’s suitability for your unique requirements.

3. Select a Foundation Model Based on Performance, Alignment with Your Use Case, and Other Key Factors.

Choosing the right foundation for your LLM application is a multifaceted decision that goes beyond just performance metrics. It involves a careful assessment of how well the model aligns with your intended use case, along with other crucial considerations.

Consider the example of an LLM designed to maximize user engagement and retention; if not properly aligned, it might favor sensationalist or controversial responses, which could be detrimental for most brands. This is a classic case of AI misalignment, where the LLM’s behavior deviates from the desired objectives. Such misalignment can stem from various sources, including poorly defined model objectives, misaligned training data, inappropriate reward functions, or insufficient training and validation.

To minimize the risk of AI misalignment, consider the following strategies:

Define Clear Objectives and Behaviors: Articulate the goals and expected behaviors of your LLM application. This should include a mix of quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria to ensure a balanced assessment of the model’s performance and alignment with your use case.
Align Training Data and Reward Functions: The data used to train the LLM and the reward functions that guide its learning process should reflect the specific needs and context of your application. This alignment is crucial for the model to develop responses and behaviors that are consistent with your objectives.
Implement Comprehensive Testing: Before deploying the model, conduct thorough testing using an evaluation set that covers a broad range of scenarios, inputs, and contexts. This step is vital to identify and address any potential issues in the model’s performance or alignment.
Establish Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation: Post-deployment, it’s essential to continuously monitor and evaluate the LLM’s performance. This ongoing assessment allows for timely detection and correction of any deviations from desired behaviors or objectives.

4. Enhance Performance by Customizing Your Foundation Model.

Customization of your chosen foundation model is key to enhancing its performance, particularly in terms of domain expertise, task specificity, and tone of voice.

There are three primary ways to customize a foundation LLM:

Fine-tuning: This method involves providing the model with a domain-specific labeled dataset, leading to updated model parameters for better performance on tasks represented in the dataset.
Domain Adaptation: This approach uses an unlabeled dataset containing extensive domain-specific data. The model parameters are updated, enhancing its performance in the specified domain.
Information Retrieval: This method augments the foundation model with closed-domain knowledge without retraining the model. The model parameters remain unchanged, but it can retrieve information from a vector database containing relevant data.

While the first two methods (fine-tuning and domain adaptation) offer significant improvements, they require considerable computing resources and technical expertise, often making them viable only for large organizations. Smaller companies often opt for the third approach – using information retrieval to augment the model with domain-specific knowledge. This approach is less resource-intensive and can be effectively managed with the right tools.

5. Establish a Suitable Machine Learning Infrastructure.

A well-designed ML infrastructure not only supports the computational demands of LLMs but also ensures scalability, reliability, and efficiency. This component is especially relevant if you choose to use an open-source model or customize the model for your application. In this case, you may need significant computing resources to fine-tune the model, if necessary, and run it.

Below are key considerations for setting up an ML infrastructure tailored for LLM applications.

Computational Resources: LLMs require significant processing capabilities, often necessitating powerful GPUs or TPUs. Assess the computational needs of your model and choose hardware that can handle these demands. As your application grows, your infrastructure should be able to scale.
Networking Capabilities: Ensure your infrastructure has the networking capabilities to handle large volumes of data transfer. This is crucial for both training and deploying LLMs, especially in distributed environments.
Data Pipeline Management: Set up efficient data pipelines for data ingestion, processing, and management. This ensures a smooth flow of data throughout the system, vital for both training and inference phases.

Cloud platforms, such as Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, and Microsoft Azure, provide specialized services for deploying LLMs. These platforms come equipped with a variety of specific features, including pre-trained models that are customizable to suit the needs of your specific application, managed infrastructure services that handle the complexities of both hardware and software requirements, a suite of tools and services dedicated to the monitoring and debugging of your LLMs.

6. Optimize Performance with LLM Orchestration Tools.

In the realm of LLM applications, the efficient handling of user queries, such as customer service requests, is crucial. This process often involves constructing a series of prompts before the actual query reaches the language model.

For example, when a user submits a query, such as a customer service question, the LLM application must perform several tasks before forwarding this query to the language model. This process typically involves:

Creating Prompt Templates: Developers hard-code these templates to guide the model in understanding and responding to various types of queries.
Incorporating Few-Shot Examples: These are examples of valid outputs that help the model grasp the context and expected response format.
Retrieving External Information: The application may need to fetch relevant data from external APIs to provide accurate and contextually rich responses.

LLM orchestration tools, offered by companies like LangChain and LlamaIndex, are designed to streamline this complex process. They provide frameworks that manage and execute these prompts in a more efficient and structured manner.

7. Safeguard Your LLM Application Against Malicious Inputs.

Securing your LLM application against malicious inputs is critical to maintain its integrity, performance, and user trust. Vulnerabilities in LLMs can arise from various sources, including prompt injection, training data poisoning, and supply chain weaknesses.

Prompt Injection

LLMs can struggle to differentiate between application instructions and external data, making them susceptible to prompt injection attacks. Here’s how to mitigate this:

Treat LLM as an Untrusted User: Approach interactions with the LLM as if it were an untrusted user. Avoid relying solely on the LLM for decision-making without human oversight.
Follow the Principle of Least Privilege: Limit the LLM’s access to only what is necessary for performing its intended tasks. Restricting its access minimizes the potential impact of a prompt injection attack.

Training Data Poisoning

The integrity of your training data is crucial. Poisoning can occur through staged conversations or toxic data injections. To combat this:

Verify Training Data Sources: Especially for externally sourced data, ensure thorough vetting to avoid incorporating malicious content.
Implement Input Filters: Use strict vetting or input filters for the training data. This helps control the volume and quality of data, reducing the risk of poisoned information.

Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

Vulnerabilities in the supply chain, including software components and third-party plugins, pose significant risks. To safeguard against these:

Vet Data Sources and Suppliers: Carefully evaluate the reliability and security of all data sources and suppliers.
Use Reputable Plugins: Opt for plugins with a proven track record of security and reliability.
Implement Rigorous Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of the LLM system can help detect and address vulnerabilities early.

Implementing these protective measures will not only safeguard the application but also preserve the trust and safety of its users.

8. Reduce the Risk of Harmful Outputs from Your LLM Application.

Even without malicious inputs, LLM applications can inadvertently produce harmful outputs, leading to safety vulnerabilities. These risks often stem from overreliance on the LLM’s outputs, unintentional disclosure of sensitive information, insecure handling of outputs, and providing excessive agency to the model.

To prevent harmful outputs, consider the following strategies:

Cross-Check LLM Outputs: Validate the outputs of your LLM application by cross-referencing them with external, reliable sources. This helps ensure accuracy and mitigate the propagation of biases or errors.
Apply the Rule of Least Privilege in Training: Be cautious about the information the LLM is trained on. Avoid exposing data that a high-privileged user can access to lower-privileged users through the model’s outputs.
Limit Permissions for LLM Agents: Grant permissions to LLM agents strictly based on necessity. This approach minimizes the risk of the LLM application overstepping its intended scope or inadvertently causing harm.
Human-in-the-Loop Control: For high-impact actions, incorporate human oversight. This control mechanism ensures that critical decisions or actions are reviewed and approved by humans, thereby reducing the risk of harmful autonomous actions by the LLM.
Clear Communication of Risks and Limitations: Regularly inform users about the potential inaccuracies and biases associated with LLMs. Providing explicit warnings about these limitations can help manage user expectations and encourage cautious reliance on LLM outputs.

By implementing these strategies, you can significantly reduce safety vulnerabilities and ensure that your LLM application remains a reliable and secure tool for users. The balance between harnessing the capabilities of LLMs and maintaining safety and reliability is key to the successful and responsible deployment of these advanced technologies.

9. Implement a Continuous Performance Evaluation System for Your LLM Application.

The evaluation process should be dynamic, adaptable to your project’s lifecycle, and incorporate user feedback. Here are key aspects to consider in developing this continuous evaluation framework:

Leverage the Targeted Evaluation Set: Start with the targeted evaluation set used initially for model selection. Adapt this set over time to reflect evolving user needs and feedback, ensuring your model stays attuned to current and relevant challenges.
Go Beyond Traditional Metrics: Relying solely on metrics for LLM evaluation can be insufficient and sometimes misleading. LLMs operate in contexts where multiple answers might be acceptable, and aggregate metrics may not accurately represent performance across different domains. The effectiveness of an LLM system also hinges on its unique characteristics. Common goals like accuracy and impartiality are crucial, but certain applications may demand different priorities. For example, a medical chatbot’s primary concern might be the safety of its responses, a customer support bot could focus on consistently conveying a friendly demeanor, or a web development tool may need to generate outputs in a particular format. To simplify evaluation, these diverse criteria can be consolidated into a unified feedback mechanism.
Consider Using the Hybrid Approach for Model Evaluation: Utilize automated evaluations facilitated by LLMs for immediate feedback. Then, utilize high-quality human assessments to validate the reliability of the automated feedback.

A robust and continuous performance evaluation process is vital for maintaining the efficacy of your LLM application. By combining targeted evaluation sets, multi-dimensional criteria, and a mix of automated and human evaluations, you can ensure that your LLM system remains effective, relevant, and aligned with user needs throughout its operational lifespan.

10. Maintain Ongoing Monitoring for Model Safety in Your LLM Application.

Continuous monitoring of model safety is essential in mitigating biases and maintaining the integrity of LLM applications. Biases can stem from various sources, including training data, reward function design, bias mitigation strategies, and even user interactions. To proactively manage and prevent biases:

Curate Training Data: Utilize carefully chosen training data for fine-tuning your model. This data should be representative and diverse to prevent the introduction of biases.
Design Bias-Aware Reward Functions: When employing reinforcement learning, ensure that the reward functions are crafted to encourage unbiased outputs. This involves designing these functions to recognize and discourage biased responses.
Implement Bias Mitigation Techniques: Use existing mitigation techniques to identify and eliminate biased patterns within the LLM. This process is crucial in ensuring that the model does not perpetuate or amplify existing biases.
Use Specialized Safety Monitoring Tools: There are tools specifically designed to monitor model safety. They work by continuously scanning the model’s outputs and flagging content that may be harmful or biased.

By implementing these measures, you can significantly reduce the risk of biases and maintain the ethical integrity of your LLM application, thereby ensuring it remains a trustworthy and valuable tool for users.

In conclusion, the landscape of LLM applications is dynamic and ever-evolving. Staying informed and adaptable, while adhering to ethical and practical guidelines, is key to building applications that not only excel in performance but also earn the trust and reliance of users. As you embark on or continue this journey, keep these ten considerations in mind to guide your path towards creating LLM applications that are not just technologically advanced but also socially responsible and user-centric.

We’ll let you know when we release more summary articles like this one.